Download Laruelle and Non-Philosophy by John Mullarkey, Anthony Paul Smith PDF

By John Mullarkey, Anthony Paul Smith

The 1st number of severe essays at the paintings of this most unique philosopher. François Laruelle is without doubt one of the most vital French philosophers of the final twenty years, and as his texts became on hand in English there was a emerging tide of curiosity in his paintings, relatively at the inspiration of 'Non-Philosophy'. Non-philosophy extensively rethinks a few of the such a lot state of the art thoughts resembling immanence, pluralism, resistance, technology, democracy, decisionism, Marxism, theology and materialism. It additionally expands our view of what counts as philosophical suggestion, via artwork, technological know-how and politics, and past to fields as different as movie, animality and fabric gadgets.

Show description

Read Online or Download Laruelle and Non-Philosophy PDF

Best history & surveys books

Reid on Ethics (Philosophers in Depth)

This is often the first edited assortment to assemble vintage items and new paintings via top students of Thomas Reid. The individuals discover key parts of Reid's ethical thought in an organised and thematic method, supplying a balanced and wide ranging quantity.

Fichte's Transcendental Philosophy: The Original Duplicity of Intelligence and Will (Modern European Philosophy)

This can be the 1st publication in English at the early works of the German thinker Johann Gottlieb Fichte (1762-1814). It examines the transcendental thought of self and global from the writings of Fichte's so much influential interval (1794-1800), and considers intimately lately found lectures at the Foundations of Transcendental Philosophy.

The pursuit of laziness : an idle interpretation of the enlightenment

We predict of the Enlightenment as an period ruled through rules of development, construction, and industry--not an period that preferred the lax and indolent person. yet was once the Enlightenment in simple terms concerning the unceasing development of self and society? The Pursuit of Laziness examines ethical, political, and fiscal treatises of the interval, and divulges that the most important eighteenth-century texts did locate worth in idleness and nonproductivity.

Additional info for Laruelle and Non-Philosophy

Example text

This is why both Deleuze and Laruelle seek to neutralise transcendence, conceiving the latter as an abstraction, an illusion which is produced in thought when the logos negates the material and ever-new moving realm from which it emerges and to which it belongs, namely the living - and not simply organic - matter or 'immanence' . However, LarueIle's and Deleuze's common struggle against transcendence should not prevent us from appreciating their radical divergence when it cornes to their account of what they both call 'immanence'.

8 Thus, Laruelle seeks to think the One outside of its convertibility with Being. It is a question of thinking a One that is deprived of any fold, which is irnmediately given, radically open and forever unfoldable. By confusing the logic of sense with that of Being, Deleuze would have overlooked the human non-thinkable essence and its foreclosure to Being. The Deleuzian plane of immanence, as 'absolute survey', is thus an idealisation of the chaotic beC0111ings of materiality for Laruelle, it is position and transcendence: their pairing is the passage or becoming of the between-two ...

Axioms of the One and the Posture of Science What we find in Laruelle is a very different form of thought precisely because of its coming from the One. His thought, as has been said before, aims to break out of the circle of self-sufficiency endemic to philosophy in order to form unified theories of thought that move outside of standard philosophy. Yet that difference is to be found in the way it fills out the practices of figures like Badiou and Deleuze and Guattari. In this way, Laruelle's non-philosophy incorpora tes elements of the division of labour found in both Badiou and Deleuze.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.81 of 5 – based on 6 votes